Quantcast
Channel: Obamacare
Viewing all 1652 articles
Browse latest View live

Americans are starting to dislike Bernie Sanders' 'Medicare for All' plan, but there is a Democratic healthcare idea that even Republicans voters like

$
0
0

bernie Sanders

  • The luster of "Medicare for All," the healthcare plan advanced by progressives such as Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, is starting to fade.
  • According to a new poll, 43% of Americans think Medicare for All is a good idea, while 45% said it is a bad idea.
  • Fifty-one percent of people said it was a good idea in August 2017, while 38% said it was a bad idea.
  • But a Medicare buy-in option, which has been advanced by more moderate Democrats, is much more popular.
  • Fifty-one percent of people surveyed supported that idea, while just 30% were against it.

Americans are starting to cool on the idea of "Medicare for All," but there is a more moderate Democratic proposal that still captures the public's attention, according to a new poll.

A Quinnipiac University poll found that support for the Medicare for All idea, which has been advanced by progressives such as Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, has slipped substantially over the last year and a half.

In August 2017, 51% of Americans thought Medicare for All was a "good idea," while just 38% thought it was a "bad idea." In the poll released on Tuesday, the percentage of Americans calling Medicare for All a "good idea" was down to 43%, while 45% said it was a "bad idea." 

Medicare for All would eliminate private insurance and enroll all Americans in the government's healthcare program. While the idea would drive up the government's spending, advocates say that the savings for average people — who would no longer have to pay insurance premiums — and the streamlining of the healthcare system would result in savings for the healthcare system as a whole.

But the idea also includes tax increases to help offset some of the government spending, which previous polling has shown drives down people's acceptance of the idea.

Read more: People love Medicare for All until they're told it'll raise their taxes

While Medicare for All may be declining in popularity, another healthcare reform advanced by Democrats still remains popular.

A Medicare buy-in, in which people could either keep their private insurance or choose to shift to the government's Medicare program, actually attracted support from a majority of people.

Fifty-one percent of Americans said the buy-in option was a "good idea," while just 30% said it is a "bad idea."

The Medicare buy-in drew much more support among Democrats and independents, but even a plurality of self-described Republicans liked the idea. Forty-three percent said it was a "good idea," while 39% said the buy-in was a "bad idea."

A number of more moderate Democrats, including 2020 presidential candidates such as Beto O'Rourke, have pushed for a Medicare buy-in plan. Others have suggested that the US should lower the age at which people qualify for Medicare to 50 from the standard of 65. 

While the Quinnipiac poll does not give reasons for the fall in the popularity of Medicare for All, there are a number of factors that could be in play. For one thing, the increased visibility of Medicare for All — which has gone from a fringe solution to part of the political mainstream — could have exposed more people to the specifics of the idea.

Additionally, many Democrats were vague about their meaning of Medicare for All — sometimes combining the idea with the Medicare buy-in. As those terms get more well-defined, it appears most people are gravitating toward the less extreme option.

SEE ALSO: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez suggested members of Congress should get paid more, but a majority of Americans want the complete opposite

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is being praised for her line of questioning at Michael Cohen's hearing — watch it here


Trump just started a new Obamacare fight with Democrats, and it could come back to haunt him in 2020

$
0
0

donald trump

  • President Donald Trump declared Tuesday that the GOP would become "The Party of Healthcare!"
  • The pronouncement came the day after the Trump administration sided with a judge's ruling that the Affordable Care Act, better known as Obamacare, should be struck down in its entirety.
  • Democrats are embracing the healthcare fight with good reason, as a slew of polling shows Americans dislike Trump's handling of healthcare and favor Democrats on the issue.
  • If the fight drags into 2020, it could be bad news for Trump and the GOP.

President Donald Trump wants Republicans to go all in on healthcare, but there's a lot of data showing the president's new policy focus might not be the best idea for the GOP.

In a tweet on Tuesday, Trump declared that the GOP would reform its image around the healthcare issue.

"The Republican Party will become 'The Party of Healthcare!'" the president said.

The tweet came the day after the Department of Justice said in a filing that the Trump administration supported a judge's recent decision that the entirety of the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, should be struck down.

If Obamacare is struck down, an estimated 20 million more Americans would go without health insurance, popular provisions like protections for people with preexisting conditions would be gone, and a huge portion of the US healthcare system would be faced with a chaotic scramble to adapt.

Read more:Experts think the ruling that declared Obamacare unconstitutional is 'insanity in print' and will likely be overturned

Given the ramifications of the repeal, the Trump administration's decision to support the decision sent shockwaves through Washington and the healthcare policy world.

"From pre-existing condition protections to premium subsidies to expanded Medicaid to closing the Medicare donut hole to breastfeeding breaks to menu labeling," Larry Levitt, the senior vice president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan healthcare think thank, tweeted. "Undoing the ACA, as the Trump administration is arguing in court, would affect almost everyone."

Obama Trump

Following the Justice Department decision, Trump kept the focus on healthcare during a meeting with GOP senators on Tuesday. According to reports, Trump applauded the DOJ move and told Republicans that the party should once again focus on health policy in Congress.

But neither the administration nor Republicans in Congress have drafted a new healthcare plan to replace the ACA.

At the same time, House Democrats rolled out a sweeping bill meant to solidify preexisting-condition protections and strengthen the ACA.

Read more:Trump keeps claiming the GOP will 'protect people with preexisting conditions.' But he's been trying to gut those protections for almost 2 years.

The flurry of activity has brought renewed attention to the healthcare fight, which could pose a serious problem for Trump and become a boon for Democrats.

In fact, here are a few reasons that healthcare in general, and the Obamacare suit specifically, could come back to bite Trump:

  • A majority of Americans now support Obamacare: Polls over the past year have shown Obamacare getting a record level of support, with a majority of Americans on board with the law.
  • The GOP's previous attempts to replace the ACA were incredibly unpopular: The last time the party attempted to repeal and replace the ACA, every iteration of its replacement was deeply unpopular. So unless there is a substantial change in the party's approach, a new attempt at replacement is likely to be a political loser.
  • Americans are very concerned about healthcare: Healthcare typically ranks among the most important issues to voters in polling, and the looming possibility of a major upheaval in the healthcare industry could make the issue even more of a factor in 2020.
  • Healthcare was a winning issue for Democrats in the 2018 midterms: Before the 2018 midterms, Democrats went all in on healthcare messaging. The party attacked opponents over their support of the GOP repeal-and-replace bills, especially highlighting the replacements' undermining of protections for people with preexisting conditions. Based on exit polling from that election, the attack worked. Healthcare was the top issue for midterm voters, and a majority of voters trusted Democrats' ability to handle healthcare changes more than the GOP's ability. Additionally, a slew of deep-red states voted to expand Medicaid under the ACA — another piece of the law that the lawsuit would repeal.
  • Americans don't like Trump's handling of healthcare: While Americans generally trust Democrats' handling of healthcare, the same cannot be said for the president. In a November 2018 Gallup poll, only 36% of people said they approved of Trump's handling of healthcare policy, while 58% disapproved. A Fox News poll published Sunday also showed that just 37% of people approved of Trump's handling of healthcare versus 52% who did not. In both of the polls, healthcare was Trump's weakest issue.
  • The timing of the Obamacare lawsuit could be bad for Trump: Given the timing of the lawsuit, there is a chance that the Supreme Court could decide on the Obamacare repeal in the fall of 2020, just before the presidential election. This means many voters could cast their votes within weeks of hearing that the Trump administration allowed a lawsuit to go forward that would force 20 million Americans to lose coverage while undermining preexisting-condition protections.

SEE ALSO: Americans are starting to dislike Bernie Sanders' 'Medicare for All' plan, but there is a Democratic healthcare idea that even Republicans voters like

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is being praised for her line of questioning at Michael Cohen's hearing — watch it here

Federal judge blocks strict Medicaid work rules in two states, dealing a blow to Trump's attempts to overhaul the US healthcare system

$
0
0

Donald Trump doctor physician

  • A federal judge blocked work requirements for Medicaid recipients in Kentucky and Arkansas on Wednesday.
  • Medicaid work requirements have been a large part of the Trump administration's attempts to overhaul the US healthcare system.
  • The judge said the requirements were "arbitrary and capricious because it did not address ... whether and how the project would implicate the 'core' objective of Medicaid: the provision of medical coverage to the needy."

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge blocked Medicaid work requirements in two states on Wednesday, dealing a blow to one of the Trump administration's marquee efforts to push the poor toward self-sufficiency.

U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg in Washington issued two decisions finding that Medicaid work requirements for low-income people in Arkansas and Kentucky pose numerous obstacles to getting health care that haven't been adequately resolved by federal and state officials.

He sent the federal Health and Human Services Department back to the drawing board.

Read more:The Trump administration just opened the door to an enormous change to Medicaid

Work requirements are already in effect in Arkansas, but Kentucky's program has been on hold because of lawsuits. Both states want "able-bodied" adults who get health insurance through the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion to work, study, volunteer or participate in "community engagement" activities.

But advocates for the poor say that Medicaid is a health care program and that work requirements have no place in it. Boasberg did not resolve that core issue.

Instead, he wrote that HHS approval of the Arkansas requirement was "arbitrary and capricious because it did not address ...whether and how the project would implicate the 'core' objective of Medicaid: the provision of medical coverage to the needy."

He used similar language in his ruling on Kentucky.

Nationally, some 12 million people are covered by the Medicaid expansion, accepted now by more than 30 states. Officials in GOP-led states have argued that work requirements and other measures such as modest premiums are needed to ensure political acceptance for the expansion.

The Trump administration early on encouraged states to apply for Medicaid waivers that would allow work requirements.

Eight states have had their requests approved, though not all have put their programs in place, according to the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation. Requests from seven others are pending. In one of those states, Virginia, a work requirement was key to getting the legislature to approve Medicaid expansion.

SEE ALSO: Trump just started a new Obamacare fight with Democrats, and it could come back to haunt him in 2020

Join the conversation about this story »

Federal judge strikes down Trump proposal allowing 'skimpy' health insurance plans

$
0
0

FILE PHOTO - U.S. President Donald Trump listens as he meets with Fabiana Rosales, wife of Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, U.S., March 27, 2019. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

  • A federal judge stuck down a Trump administration rule aimed at enabling millions of Americans to buy skimpy health insurance plans that do not comply with key Affordable Care Act requirements.
  • The judge found the rule "is clearly an end-run around the ACA," commonly called Obamacare, the signature domestic achievement of former Democratic President Barack Obama.
  • The rule, put forward by the US Department of Labor, would have allowed small businesses and those who are self-employed to band together and buy lower-cost health insurance policies, similar to large employers.

(Reuters) - A federal judge on Thursday stuck down a Trump administration rule aimed at enabling millions of Americans to buy skimpy health insurance plans that do not comply with key Affordable Care Act requirements - part of administration efforts to chip away at the healthcare law.

Judge John Bates of the US District Court for the District of Columbia found the rule "is clearly an end-run around the ACA," commonly called Obamacare, the signature domestic achievement of former Democratic President Barack Obama.

The rule, put forward by the US Department of Labor, would have allowed small businesses and those who are self-employed to band together and buy lower-cost health insurance policies, similar to large employers.

In the suit filed by 11 states and the District of Columbia, the judge found the department unreasonably expanded the definition of employers to include groups without any real commonality of interest as well as business owners without employees.

Affordable Care Act Obamacare Protesters

"Accordingly, these provisions are unlawful and must be set aside," Bates said in the ruling.

Obamacare requirements include mandatory coverage for a set of 10 essential health benefits, such as maternity and newborn care, prescription drug costs and mental health treatment

Health providers, insurers and medical groups had warned that skimpy plans could drive up premiums and make insurance unaffordable for some people by siphoning off healthy consumers who want cheaper coverage, leaving behind a sicker patient pool with higher medical costs in Obamacare plans.

Republicans have so far failed to repeal and replace Obamacare, a top 2016 campaign promise of President Donald Trump.

But the Trump administration stepped up its assault on the healthcare law with a Justice Department letter to the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals filed on Monday, saying it backed a federal judge’s ruling in December that the healthcare law violated the US Constitution because it required people to buy health insurance.

About 11.8 million consumers nationwide enrolled in 2018 Obamacare exchange plans, according to the US government's Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

(Reporting by Deena Beasley in Los Angeles; Editing by Peter Cooney)

SEE ALSO: Trump won't let go of Clinton's emails and falsely says the free software BleachBit 'is so expensive'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A mathematician gave us the easiest explanation of pi and why it's so important

We got a look at the pitch decks that buzzy $40 million startup HealthJoy used to snag early investors and then execute a huge strategic shift

$
0
0

HealthJoy

  • HealthJoy, a health-tech startup, started off selling its product to people who were newly insured through the Affordable Care Act's marketplaces. 
  • But when that market started to sour, cofounders Doug Morse-Schindler and Justin Holland realized they needed to pivot.
  • HealthJoy's story, as told through two early pitch decks shared with Business Insider, speaks to the demand for technology that can help people navigate an ever-shifting healthcare market.
  • Visit BusinessInsider.com for more stories.

Five years ago, a new startup pinned its future on the landmark healthcare law, the Affordable Care Act.

Millions of people were gaining health insurance through the law, which is often called Obamacare. Doug Morse-Schindler and Justin Holland, cofounders of HealthJoy, were sure that that those people would need help navigating their new plans, which often required patients to pay thousands of dollars for procedures and prescriptions.

HealthJoy is a digital platform for users' healthcare needs, from the specifics of their health plan to finding an in-network hospital, comparing drug prices and doing virtual doctor consults. Other similar products were out there, but "I just thought that they frankly were missing the mark," Morse-Schindler told Business Insider.

He and Holland had just sold a software analytics company they'd founded to AVG Technologies for roughly $5.6 million, and decided to take a similarly tech-enabled approach for the new company, HealthJoy. It quickly won over customers and investors alike, with over 60,000 people signing up by 2016 and around $6 million raised in its seed and Series A rounds.

Why HealthJoy shifted away from Obamacare

But then the tables suddenly turned. Health insurers had been losing money in the new market for years, and began to pull out— leaving HealthJoy on unstable ground.

HealthJoy

So HealthJoy did what startups do: it pivoted, focusing instead on selling its software to employers that provide insurance to their workers. 

The startup is now worth $40 million, according to PitchBook, after raising $12.5 million last month from investors like US Venture Partners and EPIC Ventures.

HealthJoy's story, as told through two early pitch decks shared with Business Insider, speaks to how companies are navigating an ever-shifting, often turbulent US health market.

HealthJoy redacted certain details, and requested that Business Insider not share the second slide deck in full.

Health startups like HealthJoy are being drawn to the much more stable market for employer-provided health insurance, which at more than 150 million people dwarfs the individual market's roughly 15 million.

Big companies want to help workers understand their health insurance

And employers want these tools. That need reflects "the complexity of the health system today and the complexity of how pricing and payment flows through the system,"Brian Marcotte, president and CEO of the National Business Group on Health, a nonprofit that represents large employers on issues of health policy and cost, told Business Insider.

HealthJoy now takes on the same healthcare navigation role as before, but in the employer-paid insurance market. It has signed up 300 employers across the country, and has 200,000 members total, including workers and their families. 

"The way we think about it is: Employees should have the same options for transparent pricing that someone has on consumer side," Holland, HealthJoy's CEO, said. "But as an employee, you can't really see that. You don't have information about what you'll pay before you go to the pharmacy."

Read more:The 10 people transforming healthcare

Programs that can "simplify the process while taking this complexity and sticking it behind a wall" will be essential, NBGH's Marcotte said, but they'll also need to use big data, personalized information and concierge or navigation services to better serve employees' health needs.

See how HealthJoy pitched itself to investors

In a competitive and increasingly crowded field, with big names like Accolade, Quantum Health and Grand Rounds, actually being able to deliver on that technological potential is crucial. 

"Whoever gets that first and is able to provide that will be able to differentiate themselves," Marcotte said. Companies in this space may start as tools to advocate on patients' behalf, or as digital platforms, for example — all "different starting points, but they all seem to be racing towards the same finish line."

Read on to see how HealthJoy first sold its business to investors, and how that's changed over time.

The startup used this slide deck through roughly the second or third quarters of 2015.



HealthJoy was initially focused on the individual health insurance market, selling to people who were getting their coverage through the Affordable Care Act.

This slide shows how the startup described itself as a stabilizing force for consumers trying to find their way around an opaque market.



During this early period, HealthJoy raised about $6 million total.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The Trump administration is cosigning states' efforts to overturn Obamacare, and it could leave millions without health care

$
0
0

U.S. President Donald Trump arrives for an event honoring 2018 NASCAR Cup Series Champion Joey Logano at the White House in Washington, U.S., April 30, 2019. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

  • Taking a harder line on health care, the Trump administration joined a coalition of Republican-led states Wednesday in asking a federal appeals court to entirely overturn former President Barack Obama's signature health care law — a decision that could leave millions uninsured.
  • The "Obamacare" opponents hope to persuade the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans to uphold US District Court Judge Reed O'Connor's ruling late last year striking down the law.
  • If the ruling is allowed to stand, more than 20 million Americans would be at risk of losing their health insurance, re-igniting a winning political issue for Democrats heading into the 2020 elections.
  • President Donald Trump, who never produced a health insurance plan to replace "Obamacare," is now promising one after the elections.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — Taking a harder line on health care, the Trump administration joined a coalition of Republican-led states Wednesday in asking a federal appeals court to entirely overturn former President Barack Obama's signature health care law — a decision that could leave millions uninsured.

Congress rendered the Affordable Care Act completely unconstitutional in 2017 by eliminating an unpopular tax penalty for not having insurance, the administration and GOP states told the court.

The "Obamacare" opponents hope to persuade the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans to uphold US District Court Judge Reed O'Connor's ruling late last year striking down the law.

If the ruling is allowed to stand, more than 20 million Americans would be at risk of losing their health insurance, re-igniting a winning political issue for Democrats heading into the 2020 elections. President Donald Trump, who never produced a health insurance plan to replace "Obamacare," is now promising one after the elections.

The Trump administration acknowledged it had changed positions in the case. Early on, the administration argued that only certain key parts of the ACA, such as protections for people with pre-existing medical conditions, should be invalidated. But it said other important provisions such as Medicaid expansion, subsidies for premiums and health insurance markets could continue to stand.

Wednesday, the administration said it had reconsidered in light of O'Connor's ruling. "The remaining provisions of the ACA should not be allowed to remain in effect — again, even if the government might support some individual positions as a policy matter," the administration wrote in its court filing.

The Justice Department's legal brief also seemed to be trying to carve out some exceptions. For example, the administration said the ACA's anti-fraud provisions should remain in effect.

The now-repealed fines enforce the law's insurance requirement, and without them the rest of the law cannot pass constitutional muster, the administration wrote.

O'Connor's ruling last December came in a case filed by Texas and a coalition of Republican-led states. He said that without a tax penalty, the law's requirement that most Americans have insurance is unconstitutional. Democratic attorneys general, led by California's Xavier Becerra, and the US House of Representatives have appealed.

Legal battles aside, the Obama health law has remained remarkably stable. Even with the repeal of the law's tax penalty, 11.4 million people signed up for coverage this year, just a slight dip from 2018. The law's Medicaid expansion continues to insure about 12 million low-income people. And several million young adults are on their parents' health insurance as a result of the ACA.

The appeals court is expected to hold oral arguments in July. Meanwhile, the effects of the lower court ruling have been on hold pending appeals.

The last word on any decision to strike down the health care law almost certainly will come from the Supreme Court, which has twice sustained the 2010 health law. Chief Justice John Roberts and four more liberal justices who voted in favor of the law remain on the court. A court victory would fulfill Trump's goal of undoing the law, but it could be politically costly for the GOP by ending popular provisions such as protection for pre-existing conditions and coverage for young adults on their parents' health plans.

The states took the same position as the administration.

"At issue is not what health-insurance system is optimal, but 'only whether Congress has the power under the Constitution' to command the people as the ACA does," the states wrote in their brief.

In their appeal, Becerra and his coalition argued that zeroing out the penalty does not make the individual mandate unconstitutional — noting that the framework for the tax remains in place.

Becerra was defiant Wednesday. "Our legal coalition will vigorously defend the law and the Americans President Trump has abandoned," he said in a statement.

Even if the individual mandate were unconstitutional, the law's defenders argued in briefs earlier this year that the rest of the law remains legally viable.

They said that when Congress repealed the tax penalty for those remaining uninsured, it was more like a tweak than a blow designed to bring down the entire 974-page statute. The health law also rewrote federal laws on a broad range of topics, from fighting fraud to promoting public health.

After the fines were repealed, Republican lawmakers in Congress explained their votes as an attempt to correct the law's most unpopular provision, not bring down the entire law.

Democrats also argue that if the law is to be repealed and replaced, that's the job of Congress and the president under the Constitution, not the courts.

___

Alonso-Zaldivar reported from Washington. AP writer Mark Sherman contributed.

SEE ALSO: Beto O'Rourke just endorsed a healthcare idea called 'Medicare for America' which differs in some major ways from Bernie Sanders' 'Medicare for All' plan

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Tesla has a mini Model S for kids that costs $600, and this family bought it to teach their child about driving electric

Trump says he will announce 'phenomenal' new healthcare plan within the next two months

$
0
0

trump george stephanopolous healthcare

  • President Donald Trump said he will be announcing a 'phenomenal' new healthcare plan within two months and says healthcare will be a primary focus leading up to his 2020 election campaign. 
  • Trump has repeatedly called for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act, colloquially known as "Obamacare," and Republicans previously introduced a replacement called the American Health Care Act that ultimately failed.
  • Speaking to ABC News in an interview which aired Sunday night, Trump vowed that healthcare would be on the top of his agenda in the lead-up to the presidential elections. 
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

President Donald Trump said he would be announcing a 'phenomenal' new healthcare plan within the next two months, and says healthcare will be a primary focus leading up to his 2020 election campaign. 

Trump has repeatedly called for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act, colloquially known as "Obamacare," and has promised to pass a bill that would offer "insurance for everybody." In 2017, Republican lawmakers made serious efforts to replace Obamacare with an updated version called the American Health Care Act, or ACHA, however the bill was ultimately tabled.  

Speaking to ABC News in an interview which aired Sunday night, Trump vowed that healthcare would be on the top of his agenda in the leadup to the presidential elections. 

"We almost had health care done. Health care's a disaster, Obamacare," Trump told host George Stephanopoulos. "If we win back the House, we're going to produce phenomenal health care. And we already have the concept of the plan, but it'll be less expensive than Obamacare by a lot."

When pressed for specifics on his plan, Trump said his administration would be announcing changes "in about two months. Maybe less."

Read more:After the best week of his presidency, Trump is picking a risky fight with Democrats over Obamacare

Trump has made healthcare an important issue of his reelection campaign, and recently declared that the GOP would become "The Party of Healthcare!"

In March, the Trump administration said in a court filing that it was in favor of slashing the Affordable Care Act in whole, which would completely overhaul the current system and could leave millions without health insurance. 

Trump on Friday announced new moves to expand health care choices for small businesses through healthcare reimbursement arrangements, known as HRAs, which are employer-funded health plans that reimburse employees for medical expenses not covered under their healthcare.

"HRAs will allow American workers to shop for the plan that's right for them and their family, and have their employer cover the cost," he told press from the Rose Garden. "HRAs will now receive the same tax treatment that other employer-provided health plans have always enjoyed. 

He added that another "big announcement" would be made in the coming weeks, and slammed Democratic frontrunner Bernie Sanders' "socialist" healthcare plan which would largely eliminate private health insurance. 

"Socialist healthcare would crush American workers with higher taxes, long wait times, and far worse care," he said. 

SEE ALSO: Americans like the Republican Obamacare replacement in theory — but they don't like what it does

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: YouTube is in dangerous territory after not removing a video that ridiculed a Vox producer for being gay

Congress needs to stop kicking the can and finally implement an Obamacare tax that could help bring down healthcare costs

$
0
0

Obama doctors Obamacare

  • The House of Representatives is considering a bill to permanently do away with "Obamacare's""Cadillac tax," a tax on very generous employer-sponsored healthcare plans.
  • But the Cadillac tax is actually good policy and can help to fight rising healthcare costs.
  • The Cadillac tax is also a progressive way to raise revenue.
  • Scott Eastman is federal research manager at the Tax Foundation, where he coordinates research production for the Center for Federal Tax Policy.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Even for taxes, the "Cadillac tax" is an unpopular vehicle. 

Established in 2010 by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as "Obamacare"), the Cadillac tax's implementation has been delayed twice. Now a large bipartisan group in Congress supports legislation that would end this excise tax on high-cost health-insurance plans once and for all. 

This is unfortunate because the Cadillac tax is good tax policy. The tax would limit the income tax's exclusion for employer-sponsored insurance, which encourages overconsumption of healthcare services and contributes to rising health-insurance costs. What's more, the tax would generate revenue in a progressive way by taxing mostly high-income people.

Most people won't pay the tax

The Cadillac tax is a 40% excise tax on the value of health-insurance benefits beyond certain dollar values. In 2022, when the tax is scheduled to be enacted, $0.40 would be taxed of every dollar of health-insurance benefits provided to employees beyond $11,200 for individuals or $30,150 for families

If that seems expensive, that's because it is. Most insurance plans cost much less than this. According to Kaiser Family Foundation's 2018 Employer Health Benefits Survey, the average cost of an employer-sponsored health plan in 2018 was $6,896 for individuals and $19,616 for families. 

The Cadillac tax would reduce the number of people who select high-cost health-insurance plans by making these pricey plans even more expensive. All other things being equal, consumers of high-cost health insurance would look for less expensive plans, reducing healthcare costs. 

This is exactly the reason why the Cadillac tax was established. Without the Cadillac tax, our tax code will continue to provide an unlimited subsidy for employer-sponsored health insurance. Employer-sponsored insurance benefits are excluded from an employee's income, while employers get to deduct the cost of these benefits from their own income. This means employer-sponsored health-insurance benefits go untaxed.

This is in stark contrast to wages, which are taxed by both the individual-income and payroll taxes.  

This difference is problematic because it encourages employers to provide overly generous healthcare benefits in lieu of wages. The tax code should not subsidize one form of compensation over another because this type of unequal tax treatment can lead to inefficiencies.

Case in point, this exclusion supports our system of employer-provided health insurance. Employer-provided health insurance is not bad on its face, but it can contribute to rising healthcare costs by insulating consumers from the direct cost of their healthcare decisions.

The tax is a progressive way to raise revenue

More than that, the exclusion of employer-sponsored health benefits is really expensive. 

The US Treasury projects that, from 2019 to 2028, this tax break will cost the federal government almost $3 trillion in revenue, with the majority of  benefits going to high-income taxpayers. This is because high-income people are more likely to have insurance through their employers, and the exclusion's benefits increase with a taxpayer's income because of our progressive tax system. 

Now, the Cadillac tax is not perfect.  

For instance, policymakers could have directly capped the number of health-insurance benefits employees are allowed to exclude from their taxable income. Instead, they opted to create a new tax that would be levied on health-coverage providers but paid for by employees.

It's also possible the proportion of "high-cost" health-insurance plans subject to the tax will grow over time as a result of "bracket creep." The Cadillac tax's thresholds are adjusted for inflation, but healthcare prices tend to grow faster than inflation, and this faster growth could push more plans into the Cadillac tax's territory. So even some less generous plans may eventually become subject to the tax because of this creep.

Creating a tax to indirectly limit a tax incentive is not ideal, and bracket creep is not a transparent way to raise revenue. 

But despite the provision's flaws, the Cadillac tax could help policymakers limit the exclusion for employer-sponsored insurance and raise revenue in a progressive way. Sometimes the least popular vehicles are the ones that take you the furthest.

Scott Eastman is federal research manager at the Tax Foundation, where he coordinates research production for the Center for Federal Tax Policy. Scott has a master's degree in economics from George Mason University and a bachelor's degree in political science from the University of Nebraska at Lincoln.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The incredible story behind Slack, the app that's taken over offices everywhere


Obamacare faced another critical moment in court. Over 20 million Americans could lose their health insurance if it's eventually struck down.

$
0
0

affordable care act supporters

  • The Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare, has survived two Supreme Court challenges since being signed by President Obama in 2010, but it faced another critical test in a New Orleans federal courtroom on Tuesday.
  • Two of the three judges on the appellate panel were skeptical of the law's individual mandate, which compels Americans to buy health insurance or pay a tax penalty, Axios reported.
  • If the rest of the law is tossed out, over 20 million Americans could lose their health insurance, according to the Urban Institute.
  • "This is a law touching nearly every aspect of our health care system. It's hard to imagine how invalidation would work," Urban Institute fellow Linda Blumberg told INSIDER.
  • Visit the Business Insider homepage for more stories.

The Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare, has survived two Supreme Court challenges since being signed by President Obama in 2010. But the sprawling health-care law faced another critical test in a New Orleans federal courtroom on Tuesday — and its outcome could upend the lives of millions of Americans who gained health coverage and other protections through the law.

Two of the three judges — both appointed by Republican presidents — on the appellate panel were skeptical of the law's individual mandate, which compels Americans to buy health insurance or pay a tax penalty, Axios reported. It is possible that they will uphold a lower-court ruling striking down the mandate as unconstitutional without the tax penalty that Congress scrapped when it passed the 2017 GOP tax cuts.

But the same judges are also wrestling with whether to save or strike down in the ACA, which legal experts say is likely to end up before the Supreme Court again.

At the center of the case, Texas v. Aznar, heard in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, was whether the ACA's mandate requiring most Americans buy health insurance or pay a penalty is constitutional after President Donald Trump signed the 2017 tax overhaul which eliminated the penalty. It came after a federal judge in Texas invalidated the entire law after ruling the individual mandate was unconstitutional without the tax penalty back in December.

Eighteen Republican-led states brought the case forward against the federal government, arguing that revoking the individual mandate renders the entire law unconstitutional. The Trump administration endorsed the plaintiffs earlier this year, leaving it up to 20 Democratic-led states to defend the ACA in court.

If the rest of the law is thrown out, over 20 million Americans could lose their health insurance, according to the Urban Institute. The law's protections would be gone, including helping to ensure coverage for people with preexisting conditions. Also gone would be the tax subsidies that make coverage more affordable and its protections for young adults to stay on their parent's plans until they turn 26.

Invalidating the law would likely increase costs for millions of Medicare beneficiaries and the coverage that 12 million people received under the expansion of Medicaid in 37 states, two ways that underscore the ACA's sweeping changes to American healthcare.

"The impact would be enormous," Urban Institute fellow Linda Blumberg told INSIDER of the ACA being scrapped. "This is a law touching nearly every aspect of our health-care system. It's hard to imagine how invalidation would work."

Read more: Trump is picking a risky fight with Democrats over Obamacare

Conservative economist Douglas Holtz-Eakin echoed that, telling Bloomberg News that undoing the law would cause "a thermonuclear meltdown on the health policy front."

Democrats readily criticized the Trump administration's efforts to overturn the law. Sen. Chris Murphy tweeted,"There is no way that the Trump administration and Congressional Republicans can pick back up the pieces if this lawsuit is successful."

Read more: The Trump administration says it supports striking down the entire Affordable Care Act

The ACA has survived attempts by President Donald Trump to repeal it, which Republican lawmakers have attempted to do for nearly a decade. The GOP came close in 2017, but they couldn't overcome the late Sen. John McCain's opposition and he cast the decisive vote with a thumbs-down.

During an ABC News interview in June, Trump said he would announce another"phenomenal" health care plan, but many Republicans are hoping he avoids giving Democrats an easy target going into 2020, The New York Times reported last month.

Should the law once again end up before the Supreme Court next year, the ACA's fate would be decided in the midst of a presidential campaign. And it would presents Democrats with an opportunity to run on protecting the law's popular provisions — a successful part of their political strategy that helped them recapture the House in the 2018 midterms.

"It is Trump's nightmare, that at the height of the 2020 campaign he could be in the Supreme Court trying to overturn protections for people with preexisting conditions," Democratic consultant Jesse Ferguson told CNN."I think people underestimate what this could all mean."

SEE ALSO: The newest Obamacare enrollment numbers prove the health law is 'far from dead' despite repeated attacks from Trump and the GOP

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Fox News pundits are using white supremacist language tied to 'The Great Replacement' conspiracy theory

Bernie Sanders says Joe Biden is doing what 'Republicans do' when it comes to his healthcare plan

$
0
0

bernie sanders

  • Sen. Bernie Sanders compared former Vice President Joe Biden's approach to healthcare reform to that of Republicans on Sunday, highlighting a combative new phase between two leading contenders in the Democratic presidential primary race.
  • Sanders directly rebuked Biden in an interview with The New York Times after the former vice president criticized the Vermont senator's signature "Medicare for All" plan during a New Hampshire campaign swing over the weekend.
  • Biden mentioned his opponent by name and attacked the proposal — which would create a single-payer healthcare system — as too costly to implement, citing its "$3 trillion" price and saying it would raise taxes on the middle class.
  • In a campaign video announcing a new healthcare plan on Monday, Biden again swiped at his primary rivals who supported "Medicare for All," saying that implementing it "means getting rid of Obamacare — and I'm not for that."
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Sen. Bernie Sanders compared former Vice President Joe Biden's approach to healthcare reform to that of Republicans on Sunday, highlighting a combative new phase between two leading candidates in the Democratic presidential primary race.

Sanders directly rebuked Biden in an interview with The New York Times after the former vice president criticized the Vermont senator's signature "Medicare for All" plan during a New Hampshire campaign swing over the weekend. Biden mentioned his opponent by name and attacked the proposal — which would create a single-payer healthcare system — as too costly to implement, citing its "$3 trillion" price and saying it would raise taxes on the middle class.

Read more:Americans are starting to dislike Bernie Sanders' 'Medicare for All' plan, but there is a Democratic healthcare idea that even Republicans voters like

Sanders fired back, telling The Times that he thought Biden's healthcare approach was a Republican one that aligned with the healthcare industry and disregarded measures that could save Americans money on their medical care.

"Obviously what Biden was doing is what the insurance companies and the pharmaceutical industries, Republicans, do: ignoring the fact that people will save money on their healthcare because they will no longer have to pay premiums or out-of-pocket expenses," Sanders told The Times. "They will no longer have high deductibles and high co-payments."

Read more:Democrats are embracing a radical change to US healthcare, and it could be the defining political fight for years to come

The battle between the two Democratic primary frontrunners stretched into Monday as Biden unveiled his long-anticipated healthcare plan, which would grant large new federal subsidies into the marketplaces set up under the Affordable Care Act and preserve the most popular elements of the law. It would also create a government-run public-insurance option allowing people to buy health insurance that competes with private health plans.

But in a campaign video announcing the plan, he swiped at his primary rivals who supported Medicare for All, warning that implementing it "means getting rid of Obamacare — and I'm not for that."

Then, Sanders shot back in a tweet and defended his role in approving President Barack Obama's signature healthcare law nearly a decade ago. He pointed out in a follow-up tweet that Obama supported "Medicare for-All," calling it in September last year one of the "good new ideas" Democrats were starting to embrace.

Opposing visions on healthcare reform have taken shape in the Democratic primary. Progressives on the left are arguing that aiming for Medicare for All allows the party to protect itself from negotiations that watered down the ACA's coverage and funding and to ensure universal healthcare. Moderates contend that shoring up the ACA and maintaining a role for private insurance is the most effective way to extend health insurance for Americans in the short term.

But the sprawling primary field is split: A dozen candidates favor the public option, while eight candidates support Medicare for All.

SEE ALSO: There are 2 dozen 2020 Democratic presidential candidates, but it's really only a 5 person race

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Secrets you probably didn't know about 7 famous landmarks in Washington, DC

Joe Biden may be making the same mistake with his healthcare plan that Obama did during the push to pass Obamacare

$
0
0

joe biden

  • Former Vice President Joe Biden repeated nearly verbatim a promise that President Barack Obama made a decade ago when marshaling public support to pass the Affordable Care Act.
  • That promise proved impossible to keep.
  • Those with dropped coverage represented less than 2% of the insured population at the time, which stood at 262 million people.
  • Obama's oft-repeated promise became PolitiFact's 2013 Lie of the Year. 
  • At an AARP forum in Iowa on Monday, Biden said that people who like their health plans can keep them, according to The New York Times. 
  • "If you like your health care plan, your employer-based plan, you can keep it," Biden said. "If you like your private insurance, you can keep it."
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Former Vice President Joe Biden repeated nearly verbatim a promise that President Barack Obama made a decade ago when marshaling public support to pass the Affordable Care Act. That promise proved impossible to keep.

At an AARP forum in Iowa late Monday, Biden said that people who like their health plans can keep them, according to The New York Times. 

"If you like your health care plan, your employer-based plan, you can keep it," Biden said. "If you like your private insurance, you can keep it."

Read more: Bernie Sanders says Joe Biden is doing what 'Republicans do' when it comes to his healthcare plan

The words could haunt Biden later. They echo what Obama said countless times when he was making the case to pass his signature healthcare law in 2009 and 2010, popularly known as Obamacare.

"If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan," Obama said at a 2009 town hall on healthcare in Portsmouth, New Hampshire.

But that wasn't the case for many people who bought their own insurance plans.

Millions of Americans with these individual plans received cancellation notices as key elements of the law were being implemented in the fall of 2013 — often because their plans did not meet minimum coverage standards of the law, ProPublica reported. Those with dropped coverage represented less than 2% of the insured population at the time, which stood at 262 million people.

Read more: The newest Obamacare enrollment numbers prove the health law is 'far from dead' despite repeated attacks from Trump and the GOP

The Obama administration passed a fix to allow insurers to renew existing plans for a year, but it further opened up the law to extensive Republican attacks and the damage was done.

Obama's oft-repeated promise became PolitiFact's 2013 Lie of the Year. 

Executive Director Lauren Schaver of the Partnership for America's Healthcare Future, a lobbyist group representing the pharmaceutical and insurance industry, criticized Biden's "one-size-fits-all plan"in a statement and said they believe it would disrupt the medical care people receive.

"From driving up premiums in the private market, to threatening our nation's already at-risk hospitals, to diminishing Americans' access to the quality care they need, research warns that such an approach could be disastrous for patients and consumers," Schaver said.

But Urban Institute senior healthcare fellow Linda Blumberg told INSIDER that Biden was highlighting with his remarks the plan's continuity and how it would preserve the method people receive their care, characterizing it as "a feasible plan."

"What he is trying to convey here is that his reforms are not going to replace employer-based insurance," Blumberg says, referring to the type of health insurance almost half of Americans have.

Biden's healthcare proposal largely builds on the existing structures set up under the ACA. It would inject massive federal subsidies into the marketplaces where consumers buy their healthcare. It would also create a government-run public-insurance option allowing people to buy health insurance that competes with private health plans and expand Medicaid in states that haven't done so already with around 2.5 million Americans able to qualify.

SEE ALSO: Here's how Joe Biden went from being a kid from Scranton to a US Senator, VP, and now the 2020 Democratic presidential frontrunner

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 secrets about Washington, DC landmarks you probably didn't know

Federal judge upholds a Trump short-term health insurance alternative to 'Obamacare'

$
0
0

Affordable Care Act Obamacare Protesters

  • US District Court Judge Richard J. Leon is upholding the Trump administration's health insurance plans as an alternative to the Affordable Care Act.
  • The judge ruled Friday that the potential downside of expanding short-term plans is "minimal" and "benefits are undeniable" for some consumers.
  • The Association for Community Affiliated Plans, an insurer group that sued the administration, plans to appeal.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge is upholding the Trump administration's expansion of cheaper short-term health insurance plans as an alternative to the Affordable Care Act's costlier comprehensive insurance.

US District Court Judge Richard J. Leon in Washington, DC, ruled Friday that the potential downside of expanding short-term plans is "minimal" and "benefits are undeniable" for some consumers. He found that the Trump administration had the legal authority to issue rules last year making the plans more attractive to customers.

Where available, the plans now are good for up to 12 months and may be renewed for 36 months. But they don't have to cover people with pre-existing conditions or provide basic benefits like prescription drugs.

The Association for Community Affiliated Plans, an insurer group that sued the administration, plans to appeal.

Health and Human Services' Alex Azar called the ruling "a clear victory" for patients.

SEE ALSO: The House just moved to repeal a key piece of Obamacare, with almost every member voting in favor of a $200 billion tax cut

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why the US border facilities are 'concentration camps,' according to historians

A federal judge's ruling declaring Obamacare unconstitutional leaves the GOP between a rock and a hard place

$
0
0

mcconnell trump ryan

  • A Texas judge on Friday ruled that Obamacare was unconstitutional.
  • The lawsuit that led to the ruling was brought by Republicans. It used a law passed by the GOP as the crux of the argument.
  • The judge struck down popular parts of Obamacare, which could force the GOP to come up with a plan to protect those elements or risk getting blamed for millions of people losing coverage.
  • The problem is especially acute because the ruling would eliminate certain rules Republicans explicitly said they would keep safe, including protections for people with preexisting conditions. 

A federal judge's ruling on Friday declaring the Affordable Care Act (ACA) unconstitutional could leave Republicans stuck in political limbo as the fate of millions of people's healthcare remains unclear.

US District Judge Reed O'Connor's broad decision argued that because the GOP virtually eliminated the ACA's individual mandate as part of their tax law, the rest of the ACA — better known as Obamacare — was also unconstitutional.

The ruling, if upheld by higher courts, would eliminate a slew of hugely popular Obamacare provisions, ranging from protections for people with preexisting conditions to the ability for children to stay on their parent's healthcare plan until age 26.

So the risk for the GOP is that voters may see a ruling:

  • Based on a case brought by Republican attorneys general;
  • Not defended by the Trump administration;
  • Citing a law passed exclusively with Republicans votes that takes away protections that are wildly popular and could leave as many as 20 million more Americans without coverage.

"The ruling once again elevates the debate on healthcare after Republicans had begun to move away from the issue in the 2018 midterm election cycle, as many candidates saw it becoming a net negative with voters," Ed Mills, a policy analyst at Raymond James, wrote Monday.

The risk is particularly acute because the GOP already has seen the political danger in losing the healthcare message battle. In the midterms, healthcare was the top issue for voters, and a majority of people trusted Democrats to better handle the issue — despite Republican candidates' embrace of issues like preexisting-condition protections.

Read more:Republicans made a lot of promises about preexisting conditions before the midterms

This massive advantage helped fuel the Democrats' large gain in the House.

The concern over the ruling was apparent, as few prominent Republicans rushed to celebrate the ruling, and some formerly pro-repeal leaders were uncharacteristically mum. For instance, House Speaker Paul Ryan only issued a short statement via a spokesperson: "The House was not party to this suit, and we are reviewing the ruling and its impact."

Greg Valliere, chief global strategist at Horizon Investments, said the ruling adds another aspect to the Republicans' recent troubles with healthcare and will force the party into coming up with a concrete solution.

"Ironically, most Republicans reacted — in private — with dismay because they will once again get saddled with the burden of coming up with a replacement — and because their efforts to kill the law have jeopardized popular health provisions," Valliere said.

Without a serious plan to protect the popular parts of the ACA, Republicans could end up in an even worse spot than they did during the midterms. But so far, every GOP replacement plan has polled dismally with Americans — and coming up with an idea that simultaneously protects the popular parts of Obamacare, preserves coverage gains, and appeals to the anti-Obamacare Republican base could prove difficult.

Given the pitfalls, some Republicans were scrambling to reassure people that the ruling itself would likely be overturned and there was no reason to worry.

"The judge's ruling was far too sweeping," Sen. Susan Collins, who voted against the GOP's attempts to repeal and replace Obamacare, said on ABC. "He could have taken a much more surgical approach and just struck down the individual mandate and kept the rest of the law intact. I believe that it will be overturned."

On the flipside, the decision could also be a boon for Democrats. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday that Democrats plan to use the case to put pressure on the GOP to help preserve protections. 

"The first thing we’re going to do when we get back there in the Senate is urge, put a vote on the floor, urging an intervention in the case," Schumer said. "The judge — a lot of this depends on congressional intent. And if a majority of the House and a majority of the Senate say that this case should be overturned, it'll have a tremendous effect on the appeal."

SEE ALSO: Trump's trade war could cost every middle-class American family $453 and could eliminate 292,000 US jobs

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A year after Armenia's 250,000-person revolution, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan explains what comes next for the country

Federal judge upholds a Trump short-term health insurance alternative to 'Obamacare'

$
0
0

Affordable Care Act Obamacare Protesters

  • US District Court Judge Richard J. Leon is upholding the Trump administration's health insurance plans as an alternative to the Affordable Care Act.
  • The judge ruled Friday that the potential downside of expanding short-term plans is "minimal" and "benefits are undeniable" for some consumers.
  • The Association for Community Affiliated Plans, an insurer group that sued the administration, plans to appeal.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge is upholding the Trump administration's expansion of cheaper short-term health insurance plans as an alternative to the Affordable Care Act's costlier comprehensive insurance.

US District Court Judge Richard J. Leon in Washington, DC, ruled Friday that the potential downside of expanding short-term plans is "minimal" and "benefits are undeniable" for some consumers. He found that the Trump administration had the legal authority to issue rules last year making the plans more attractive to customers.

Where available, the plans now are good for up to 12 months and may be renewed for 36 months. But they don't have to cover people with pre-existing conditions or provide basic benefits like prescription drugs.

The Association for Community Affiliated Plans, an insurer group that sued the administration, plans to appeal.

Health and Human Services' Alex Azar called the ruling "a clear victory" for patients.

SEE ALSO: The House just moved to repeal a key piece of Obamacare, with almost every member voting in favor of a $200 billion tax cut

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 secrets about Washington, DC landmarks you probably didn't know

The number of Americans without health insurance jumped for the first time since the Obamacare debate kicked off in 2009

$
0
0

medical

  • A new report from the Census Bureau says the number of Americans without health insurance jumped for the first time since 2009, the year the Affordable Care Act — popularly known as Obamacare—  underwent a bruising political debate before it was signed into law in 2010.
  • Last year, 27.5 million people — or 8.5% of everyone in the US — didn't have health insurance, according to the report.
  • The number of uninsured people increased by 1.9 million people compared to 2017, when it stood at 25.6 million people, or 7.9% of the US population. 
  • The report also said that Hispanics experienced a 1.6 percentage point drop in insurance coverage between 2017 and 2018 — and a similar pattern emerged for immigrants.
  • Health policy experts interpreted the decrease as partially the result of a chilling effect of the Trump administration's efforts to restrict access to public assistance, the Washington Post reported.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

A new report from the US Census Bureau says the number of Americans without health insurance jumped for the first time since 2009, the year the Affordable Care Act — popularly known as Obamacare—  underwent a bruising political debate before it was signed into law in 2010.

Last year, 27.5 million people — or 8.5% of everyone in the US — didn't have health insurance, according to the report. The number of uninsured people increased by 1.9 million people compared to 2017, when it stood at 25.6 million people, or 7.9% of the population. 

The increase was mostly driven by a drop in the number of people being covered in public programs like Medicaid, which decreased by 0.7%. More Americans going without health insurance is a remarkable development, given the relative strength and resiliency of the economy.

"In a period of continued economic growth, continued job growth, you would certainly hope that you wouldn't be going backwards when it comes to insurance coverage," Sharon Parrott, senior vice president at the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, told The New York Times.

The report also said that Hispanics experienced a 1.6 percentage point drop in insurance coverage between 2017 and 2018 — and a similar pattern emerged for immigrants. Just under half of Hispanics have any form of health insurance, the lowest of any racial demographic in the US.

Health policy experts interpreted the decrease as partially the result of a chilling effect of the Trump administration's efforts to restrict access to public assistance, the Washington Post reported. Last month, it announced intentions to implement a new rule barring immigrants deemed likely to use public aid programs from receiving their green card.

Read more:The Trump administration is planning to roll out a new rule rejecting green cards for immigrants on food stamps and other public aid

Republicans have long sought to undercut Obamacare, which expanded access to health insurance through state and federal marketplaces where people can acquire coverage subsidized by the government. Fully implemented in 2014, the law also broadened the reach of Medicaid in 37 states, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. 

The Census data also shows that only 3.3% of people obtained health coverage through the state or federal health insurance marketplaces set up under the ACA, indicating its a relatively small fraction of the insurance market.

While the Census report says the poverty rate is at its lowest level since 2001, that hasn't fully translated to people finding jobs with health insurance. 

"There are fewer people in poverty and more people working, but the jobs low-income people are getting often don't come with health benefits," Kaiser Family Foundation President Larry Levitt tweeted. "So, job-based health insurance isn't growing, even in an economy with low unemployment."

SEE ALSO: Democrats are clashing over how to fix US health care. Here are the 7 key terms you need to know.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how the top 7 Democratic presidential candidates want to transform the US economy


Trump is starting to undermine health coverage, but the real danger is on the horizon

$
0
0

Donald Trump doctor physician

  • President Donald Trump's policies are starting to take a toll on health-insurance coverage in the US, according to new Census Bureau data.
  • More than 1 million more Americans were without health insurance in 2018 compared to the year before.
  • But while Trump's moves are starting to increase the number of uninsured, the real danger, a full Obamacare repeal, still looms on the horizon.
  • Aviva Aron-Dine is the vice president for Health Policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

President Donald Trump has said that, politically, the best thing he could do is to let the Affordable Care Act "explode."

Though the ACA certainly hasn't exploded, fresh Census Bureau data released this week provides the clearest evidence yet that the Trump administration's policies are eroding the law's historic coverage gains.

Some 8.5% of Americans — 27.5 million people — lacked health coverage last year, up from 7.9% in 2017, the bureau reported in its latest annual report on health coverage in America.

All three of the major federal health surveys show that the number of Americans without insurance has increased by 1 million or more since 2016, despite a growing economy and falling unemployment. That's following six years of coverage gains that brought the uninsured rate to its lowest level in history.

But while this erosion is harmful, a full-scale ACA repeal, which the administration is continuing to pursue through the courts, would make matters far, far worse.

Trump's policies undermine the ACA

Trump policies that have undermined coverage include a repeal of the ACA's individual mandate, the requirement that people have coverage or pay a penalty. And while a repeal did not take effect until 2019, experts have concluded it reduced coverage significantly starting in 2018 because of consumer confusion.

The administration has also cut federal outreach and advertising for the ACA marketplaces by 90% and is supporting harsh new state policies that make it harder for people to enroll or stay enrolled in Medicaid.

In addition, the administration's harsh anti-immigrant stance — including changing how Medicaid eligibility affects decisions concerning who can legally enter the US and which immigrants here legally can adjust to lawful permanent resident status — have sown widespread fear and confusion in immigrant communities, likely increasing uninsured rates in families that include immigrant members.

The new census data offers suggestive evidence that this climate of fear is taking a toll on health coverage. The uninsured rate among Latinos rose 1.6 percentage points, more than for other racial or ethnic groups, and the uninsured rate among Latino children rose 1 percentage point. Also suggestive, coverage losses were especially large among foreign-born residents, both noncitizens and citizens.

Looking beyond 2018, coverage losses from administration policies will most likely keep growing. For the first time this year, the census report includes some preliminary data on uninsured rates for the current year. These data shows a further rise in the uninsured rate between March 2018 and March 2019.

The real danger is a full ACA repeal

Even with coverage trends moving in the wrong direction, however, the "Census American Community Survey" shows that the uninsured rate remains 40% below its 2010 level, which means that 21 million more people have health coverage. The Centers for Disease Control's "National Health Interview Survey" shows that despite this year's reversal, the uninsured rate remains lower than in any other year from 1963 through 2014.

That's because the ACA's major coverage provisions are continuing to cover millions of people who would otherwise be uninsured. Consistent with that, the "National Health Interview Survey" data also shows that the share of Americans who went without care because of cost in 2018 was down 30% relative to its 2010 peak.

But with 18 Republican state attorneys general, the administration is continuing to seek the ACA's full repeal through the courts. And while it claims to have a replacement for the ACA in mind, the administration's budget proposals endorse a "repeal and replace" plan that would still eliminate the ACA's expansion of Medicaid to low-income adults, the ACA marketplaces, and nationwide protections for people with preexisting conditions.

Based on Urban Institute projections, we estimate that if courts struck down the ACA this year, the uninsured rate would rise above pre-ACA levels to 18.7%, with nearly 20 million more people becoming uninsured.

Keep your eye on the courts, because the harm from a full-scale ACA repeal would dwarf the coverage erosion of 2018 that we see in the latest data.

Aviva Aron-Dine is the vice president for health policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Before rejoining the Center, in 2017, Aron-Dine served as a senior counselor to the secretary at the Department of Health and Human Services, with responsibility for Affordable Care Act implementation as well as Medicaid, Medicare, and delivery-system reform.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Sharks aren't the deadliest creatures on Earth. Here are the top 10.

How to get health insurance for 2020: Your guide to open enrollment season

$
0
0

man at doctor's office

If you've previously had employer-sponsored health insurance or have been covered by a family healthcare plan, you may not be familiar with open enrollment. But if you need to buy your own health insurance this year, open enrollment is an important time period to pay attention to. 

Even if you have an existing individual health insurance plan, you don't want to ignore the open enrollment period. Let's take a look at what open enrollment is, why it's important, and when it happens each year.

What is open enrollment?

Open enrollment is a period of time each year when you can shop for and enroll in a health insurance plan. You can also change or cancel your current coverage during the open enrollment period.

Before 2014, you could enroll year-round for health insurance. But you'd also generally need to submit to medical underwriting and could be denied coverage if you had pre-existing conditions. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), you cannot be denied coverage when you apply during the open enrollment period.

In most states, open enrollment for 2020 coverage runs from November 1st to December 15th, 2019. State-run exchanges may have more flexible open enrollment periods. Find the marketplace in your state.

If you miss the open enrollment period, you won't be able to enroll in a plan unless you have a qualifying event that triggers a special enrollment period. Examples include getting married, having a baby, or losing employer-sponsored coverage.

How to shop for health insurance during open enrollment

Coverage for plans sold during open enrollment will begin on January 1, 2020. Since open enrollment ends December 15th, you won't be able to change coverage in January if you're surprised by a premium increase. So it's important to shop around each year during open enrollment to make sure that you're still getting the best deal.

For most states, you'll sign up for health coverage at Healthcare.gov. If this will be your first time using the marketplace, you'll need to fill out an application

Once you've finished your application, you can begin shopping for a plan. There are four types of health insurance plans: Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum.

Regardless of which plan you choose, your quality of care will be the same. The difference between plans comes down to how much of your medical expenses you'll be required to pay. 

  • Healthcare.gov says that you can expect to pay 40% of your healthcare costs with most Bronze plans (and your insurer will cover the other 60%). 
  • With Platinum plans, on the other hand, you'll typically pay only 10% of your healthcare expenses (while insurance will cover the other 90%).

However, Platinum plans also have the most expensive monthly premiums. If you're in good health, you may save money by choosing a Bronze or Silver plan. But if you have an ongoing medical condition, a Gold or Platinum plan may be a better choice.

If you need help filling out your application or signing up for coverage, feel free to set up a phone call with a local Healthcare Navigator. And for more general information about open enrollment and tips for finding the right plan, visit Healthcare.gov.

More coverage from How to Do Everything: Money

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's why flight attendants avoid drinking tap water on airplanes

I'm self-employed and I shop for health insurance every year. Here's the equation I use to choose the best plan.

$
0
0

woman at doctor's office

  • I'm a full-time freelancer, so I purchase a health insurance policy on the marketplace every year. 
  • To find the best plan for myself, I run the numbers — including copays, premiums, out-of-pocket maximums, and prescription costs. 
  • After finding total annual costs, I take other things under consideration, such as in-network access to my doctors.
  • Read more personal finance coverage.

As a self-employed individual, every year during open enrollment I head to Healthcare.gov to select a health insurance policy. (Open enrollment runs from November 1st to December 15th this year.)

I pull out a spreadsheet to make my decisions, but for those who are spreadsheet-averse, it is a doable task even without Google Sheets. Here's how to get started.

Ballpark your projected healthcare expenses

Before I even start looking at plans, I'll get as close as I can to an accurate estimate of my upcoming healthcare needs. 

Sometimes I will average out the number of times I interacted with the healthcare system over the past few years. Other times, when I am able to project at least some of my future healthcare expenses, I will use my knowledge of my anticipated short-term medical needs. 

I slot those needs into four categories:

  • Number of annual primary care provider (PCP) visits for which you are charged a copay or coinsurance
  • Number of specialist visits per year for which you are charged a copay or coinsurance
  • Number of ER visits
  • Number and type of prescriptions filled

These numbers will all be educated guesses. No one can see the future, and you have no idea how much insurance you will or won't need until after you need it. 

Gather plan data, including deductibles, out-of-pocket maximums, and copays

I have a fair number of specialist visits and prescriptions filled annually. This takes high-deductible healthcare plans (HDHPs) off the table. I generally end up looking at silver or even gold plans because the coverage — even with its higher premiums — will save me money over the course of a year. 

The first thing I look at is the deductible. This is the amount I will have to pay before coinsurance starts to kick in. 

For example, my plan might cover 80% of my expenses after I meet my $3,000 deductible. I'd be responsible for the other 20% until I reach my out-of-pocket max, which is another number you should note and write down. 

Next, I find copay information. Depending on the plan, I may be offered a flat copay for visits to my PCP, specialist, or the ER, or I may be offered coinsurance requiring me to cover a certain percentage of my bill every time I go in for care.

Finally, I check prescription coverage. If you have a medication you take regularly, you may want to search for specific coverage for the drug you take.

Plug in the numbers

Now you have the numbers you need to make a good estimation. You have an idea of how much you'll need to access healthcare, and plugging these numbers into each individual plan can give you a better idea of anticipated costs beyond premiums.

Estimate copays

For each plan, multiply the copay/coinsurance by the number of PCP visits you have per year. Do the same for anticipated specialist and ER visits. 

For example, if you anticipate making a total of five visits to your PCP with a $10 copay per visit, five visits to specialists with a $40 copay, and want to allow for two emergency room visits with a $500/visit copay, you'd multiply the copay by the number of anticipated visits for each category. 

Your expected PCP visits would theoretically cost $50 in copays, the specialists would be $200, and the ER would be $1,000, so your anticipated annual copay in this example is $1,250.

Estimate out-of-pocket charges

Next, estimate the average or projected out-of-pocket charges. To do that, look over all the expenses insurance didn't cover last year. Maybe they partially covered it through coinsurance, but you still had to pay part of the bill. 

Are any of these expenses regular? If so, add them to your predicted tab for the upcoming year. You may want to throw an unexpected lab in there for good measure, especially if you're headed to the ER. 

For example, last year your insurance charged you 20% on top of your copay for visits to your doctor that were not covered under preventive care. You don't want to take the 20% you paid; you want to consider 100% of the expense in your calculations. If you don't have a lab from the past year, you can look another year back or even call your local diagnostic lab to get a quote for current services with your insurer. 

Let's say you add all these services together, and figure the total cost is $2,700. The healthcare plan you're considering offers coinsurance where you'd be paying 10%, bringing your total costs for services outside your deductible to $270.

Does this exceed out-of-pocket maximums?

Next, add together the $270 coinsurance and $1,250 deductible total, plugging in your own numbers, of course. In this example, the sum will be $1,520.

Then, look at the max out-of-pocket costs for the plan; let's say it's $1,200 in this example. That means you will only have to shoulder $1,200 of the costs and insurance will cover the remaining $320 — and any additional costs incurred thereafter.

Estimate prescription costs

Depending on how your prescription plan works, you will run a similar process for prescription costs throughout the year. However, this process isn't quite as straightforward because of the complex way in which prescription prices are set for consumers. 

If you need a drug regularly, your best bet is to read the plan to find out if it is covered, and if so, which pricing tier it is on. 

If you are running rough calculations, you may want to look at a couple of commonly prescribed prescriptions, such as antibiotics or pain medications, in case you do catch a bout of illness or incur injury throughout the year. 

If you cannot find this in the text of your plan, which should be provided by the marketplace, you can try calling the insurer. Keep in mind, though, that many customer service reps are disallowed from making guarantees about coverage benefits, so calling and reading might be equally as frustrating.

For our example, let's assume $54/year in prescription costs, though yours could obviously be much higher depending on your medical needs and insurance coverage.

Total annual projected healthcare plan costs

Add the copays, additional out-of-pocket costs, and prescription costs together. Then, multiply the monthly premiums, including subsidies, by 12. This is the amount you'll pay for your premium throughout the year — add it to the cost of your copays, out-of-pocket costs, and prescription costs. 

In this example, your total out-of-pocket costs are $1,200 plus $54 in anticipated prescription costs. The offered monthly premiums are $462 after subsidies. You multiply that by 12, giving you a total of $5,544. This plus the $1,200 and $54 brings the grand projected total costs under this plan to $6,798.

This should not be considered a hard number; your costs may come in over or under depending on your actual healthcare needs throughout the year. Insurance is always a calculated gamble. But having this number for your anticipated needs can give you a better idea of how each plan could potentially play out for you throughout the year. 

Choose a plan

Theoretically, whichever plan has the lowest total number should be the best overall choice based on annual costs alone. However, there can be extenuating factors.

For example, if you have many healthcare needs but you won't hit your out-of-pocket max until June, you might have almost zero medical bills for the second half of the year as insurance coverage should kick in full-force. But you have to be able to float the medical costs the first six months of the year. And if you can't, the overall cheapest plan might not be the most viable for you. 

For the past several years, I have been purchasing more expensive plans because my doctors were only in-network for one of the two insurance networks in my region. I'm not willing to switch healthcare providers every year as I chase the lowest premiums.

Figuring out the best healthcare plan for you may be as easy as determining the cheapest option after you plug in the numbers. Even if it's not, running the math is an important step. It forces you to literally put a dollar value on your choices as you make some hard ones.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Columbia Law School professor explains exactly how impeachment works, and what it takes for a president to be impeached

Open enrollment runs from November 1st to December 15th, but there are 2 possible ways to get health insurance if you miss it

$
0
0

doctor's office

  • For most states, open enrollment for 2020 coverage begins on November 1st and ends December 15th. 
  • If you miss the open enrollment period, you generally won't be able to enroll in a healthcare plan unless you qualify for a special enrollment period.
  • Medicaid, CHIP, and short-term health insurance policies don't use open enrollment — you can apply to those programs at any time.
  • Read more personal finance coverage.

Open enrollment is the set time period each year when you can shop for and enroll in a health insurance plan. It's also your opportunity to modify or cancel your existing coverage.

Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), no one can be rejected for health coverage, even if they have pre-existing conditions. However, if you miss the open enrollment period, you generally won't be eligible to apply for coverage later.

Let's take a look at when open enrollment takes place and the options that are available to you if you happen to miss the open enrollment period.

When is open enrollment?

For most states, open enrollment for 2020 coverage begins on November 1st and ends December 15th. 

If your state uses the Healthcare.gov exchange, this will be your open enrollment period. However, if your state uses its own exchange, it may have a wider open enrollment period.

What happens if I miss open enrollment?

If you miss the open enrollment period, you generally won't be able to enroll in a healthcare plan. However, there are two main exceptions.

Special enrollment periods

First, you can enroll in a health insurance plan at any time throughout the year if you qualify for a special enrollment period. Here are a few events that can trigger a special enrollment period:

  • You got married
  • You moved
  • You had a baby, adopted a child, or took in a foster child
  • You lost insurance through a divorce or legal separation
  • You lost insurance due to the death of someone on your marketplace plan
  • You lost employer-sponsored coverage
  • You lost eligibility for Medicare or Medicaid

Learn more about events that can trigger a special enrollment period.

It's important to point out that you'll need to apply for coverage within 60 days of your qualifying event. If you don't apply within 60 days, you'll lose eligibility for special enrollment and will have to wait for the next general open enrollment period.

Types of health insurance that don't use open enrollment

If you missed the open enrollment period and don't qualify for a special enrollment period, you still have options. There are three types of insurance that you can apply for all year long:

  • Medicaid: If you qualify for your state's Medicaid program, you can enroll at any time.  
  • CHIP (Children's Health Insurance Program): Once again, if you meet the qualification criteria for your state's CHIP program, you can apply at any time throughout the year.
  • Short-term health insurance: This type of insurance can cover you until the next open enrollment period. However, these policies are not regulated by the ACA, so you could be denied coverage if you have pre-existing conditions.

It should also be pointed out that supplemental insurance can typically be bought at any time throughout the year. Examples of supplemental insurance policies include vision and dental, critical illness, accident, and hospitalization insurance.

Medigap is another type of supplemental insurance, designed specifically for those who have Medicare insurance. Medigap policies can help pay for things your original Medicare policy won't, like deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance. Typically, you'll have a six-month open enrollment period for Medigap policies starting the month after you enroll in Medicare Part B.

To learn more about open enrollment and how to apply for marketplace insurance, check out Healthcare.gov.

More coverage from How to Do Everything: Money

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Most maps of Louisiana aren't entirely right. Here's what the state really looks like.

The most popular Obamacare plan will see premiums drop 4% next year, coupled with a boost in insurers

$
0
0

donald trump

  • The premium for the most popular health insurance plan in federal exchanges set up under the Affordable Care Act is set to drop 4% next year — and it will be coupled with a boost in the number of insurers offering plans.
  • The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said there would be 175 insurers in the exchanges in 2020, compared to 132 last year. 
  • The Trump administration touted the announcement on Tuesday, lauding its handling of the law even as its worked to end it.
  • The additional insurers and falling premiums suggest the law may be stabilizing after several years of turmoil.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

The premium for the most popular health insurance plan in the federal exchanges set up under the Affordable Care Act is set to drop 4% next year — and it will be coupled with a boost in the number of insurers offering plans.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said there would be 175 insurers in the exchanges in 2020, compared to 132 last year. 

The Trump administration touted the announcement on Tuesday, lauding its handling of the law even as its worked to end it. A decision on the law's constitutionality is pending in a federal appeals court, and the Trump administration has supported the case that seeks to overturn the law.

"The President has delivered lower costs and more options under the Affordable Care Act for two straight years, and this work reflects his overall approach to healthcare: protect what works and fix what's broken," Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar said in a press release on Monday.

Read more: Obamacare faced another critical moment in court. Over 20 million Americans could lose their health insurance if it's eventually struck down.

Though acknowledging the law's success in helping restrain costs, Azar later criticized it as "unaffordable" for a significant slice of Americans.

"The ACA simply doesn't work and it is still unaffordable for far too many. But until Congress gets around to replacing it, President Trump will do what he can to fix the problems created by this system for millions of Americans," Azar said.

An average 27-year old acquiring a benchmark "silver plan" will pay an average premium of $388 a month and a family of four would pay $1,520 a month. However, the federal subsidies would absorb much or most of the cost.

Open enrollment in the federal exchanges is slated to take place from November 1 to December 15, and the states managing their own often have longer periods of enrollment. Azar said the law would remain in place should the federal panel rule in the plaintiff's favor.

Read more: The number of Americans without health insurance jumped for the first time since the Obamacare debate kicked off in 2009

The administration also pointed out premiums remain high for those who don't qualify for subsidies, individuals who earn more than $49,960 or families of four earning more than $103,000 next year. CNN reported that 87% of people buying on the exchanges qualify for federal subsidies.

The additional insurers and falling premiums suggest the law may be stabilizing after several years of turmoil. Over 20 million Americans have gained coverage under Obamacare, according to the Urban Institute, a left-leaning think tank.

Studies have shown that stabilization could have come earlier if the Trump adminstration hadn't sought to gut the law, as it repealed the individual mandate and expanding the number of plans exempt from the law's requirements.

"In a stable policy environment, average premiums for ACA-compliant plans would likely fall in 2019," Brookings Institute health policy fellow Matthew Fiedler wrote in September 2018. Instead, the Kaiser Family Foundation found earlier this year that average premiums stayed largely the same.

SEE ALSO: One chart shows how steep of a decline there's been in the percentage of children outearning their parents since the 1940s

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Columbia Law School professor explains exactly how impeachment works, and what it takes for a president to be impeached

Viewing all 1652 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>